Home / Western Theory / Western Tunings

Western Tunings

From Pythagoras's circle of pure fifths to Just Intonation, Meantone, Bach's Well Temperaments, and modern 12-Tone Equal Temperament: the acoustic science and harmonic trade-offs of Western tuning.

🎹 Interactive Temperament Workbench

Reference C4 = 261.63 Hz (A4 = 440.0 Hz)

Drag string vertically to pluck with velocity · Frets shift dynamically across temperaments
📐 Monochord Fretboard: Pythagorean Tuning (c. 500 BCE) · Pure 3:2 Fifths · Ditone E4 at 79.01% string length
🎹 Click any white natural or black accidental key to audition & inspect across temperaments · Drag monochord above to pluck
C4 Tonic (Unison) DIATONIC
Ratio: 1 / 1 · 261.63 Hz · 0.0 ¢

Tonic home pitch. Invariant fundamental of the scale.

Active Frequency
261.63 Hz
Pythagorean
Harmonic Ratio
1 / 1
1.0000x
Cents (Octave)
0.0 ¢
0.0 ¢ vs 12-TET
Eastern Equivalent
सा (Sa)
Madhya Ṣaḍja
Harmonic Audition: Click "Audition C Major Triad" to listen to the third (E4) against the fifth (G4). In Just Intonation and Meantone, the third is pure and motionless; in 12-TET, it beats noticeably (13.7 ¢ sharp); in Pythagorean, it produces a harsh 16-Hz rattle (21.5 ¢ sharp).
🎧 Hear C4 Across All 5 Western Temperaments:

1. The Dilemma of Temperament: Why Pure Fifths Cannot Close the Octave

The fundamental acoustic conflict at the heart of Western music history: the mathematical incompatibility between octaves (2:1), fifths (3:2), and major thirds (5:4).

In acoustic physics, no mathematical power of 3:2 (pure fifth) can ever equal any power of 2:1 (pure octave), because 3 and 2 are distinct prime numbers:

The Circle of Fifths Incompatibility:

(3/2)^12 = 531441 / 4096 = 129.7463...
2^7 = 128.0000...

Twelve stacked pure fifths overshoot seven octaves by a ratio of 531441 / 524288 = 1.013643..., an excess of 23.46 cents. This discrepancy is known as the Pythagorean Comma.

The Major Third Incompatibility:

Four stacked pure fifths: (3/2)^4 / 4 = 81 / 64 = 1.265625 (407.82 cents)
Pure natural harmonic major third: 5 / 4 = 1.250000 (386.31 cents)

Four stacked fifths overshoot the pure natural third by 81 / 80 = 1.0125, an excess of 21.51 cents. This discrepancy is known as the Syntonic Comma (identical to the ancient Indian Pramāṇa Śruti).

For over two millennia, every Western tuning system was an ingenious compromise designed to distribute or conceal these two commas.

2. Grand Comparative Table: 5 Historical Western Tuning Systems

Pitch values in cents and exact frequencies (Hz) calculated from C4 = 261.63 Hz (A4 = 440.0 Hz).

Note Interval Pythagorean (¢) Just (5-Limit) (¢) Meantone (¢) Werckmeister III (¢) 12-TET (¢) Eastern Swara
C4 Tonic (Unison) 0.0 ¢ (261.63 Hz) 0.0 ¢ (261.63 Hz) 0.0 ¢ (261.63 Hz) 0.0 ¢ (261.63 Hz) 0.0 ¢ (261.63 Hz) Sa (सा)
C# / Db Minor 2nd 90.2 ¢ (275.6 Hz) 111.7 ¢ (279.1 Hz) 76.0 ¢ (273.3 Hz) 90.2 ¢ (275.6 Hz) 100.0 ¢ (277.18 Hz) Komal Re (रे)
D4 Major 2nd 203.9 ¢ (294.33 Hz) 203.9 ¢ (294.33 Hz) 193.2 ¢ (292.5 Hz) 192.2 ¢ (292.3 Hz) 200.0 ¢ (293.66 Hz) Śuddha Re (रे)
Eb / D# Minor 3rd 294.1 ¢ (310.08 Hz) 315.6 ¢ (313.95 Hz) 310.3 ¢ (312.9 Hz) 294.1 ¢ (310.08 Hz) 300.0 ¢ (311.13 Hz) Komal Ga (ग)
E4 Major 3rd 407.8 ¢ (331.12 Hz) 386.3 ¢ (327.03 Hz) 386.3 ¢ (327.03 Hz) 390.2 ¢ (327.7 Hz) 400.0 ¢ (329.63 Hz) Śuddha Ga (ग)
F4 Perfect 4th 498.0 ¢ (348.83 Hz) 498.0 ¢ (348.83 Hz) 503.4 ¢ (349.9 Hz) 498.0 ¢ (348.83 Hz) 500.0 ¢ (349.23 Hz) Śuddha Ma (म)
F# / Gb Tritone 611.7 ¢ (372.5 Hz) 590.2 ¢ (367.9 Hz) 579.5 ¢ (365.6 Hz) 588.3 ¢ (367.5 Hz) 600.0 ¢ (369.99 Hz) Tīvra Ma (म॑)
G4 Perfect 5th 702.0 ¢ (392.44 Hz) 702.0 ¢ (392.44 Hz) 696.6 ¢ (391.2 Hz) 696.1 ¢ (391.1 Hz) 700.0 ¢ (391.99 Hz) Pa (प)
Ab / G# Minor 6th 792.2 ¢ (413.3 Hz) 813.7 ¢ (418.6 Hz) 772.6 ¢ (408.7 Hz) 792.2 ¢ (413.3 Hz) 800.0 ¢ (415.30 Hz) Komal Dha (ध)
A4 Major 6th 905.9 ¢ (441.49 Hz) 884.4 ¢ (436.05 Hz) 889.7 ¢ (437.4 Hz) 888.3 ¢ (437.0 Hz) 900.0 ¢ (440.00 Hz) Śuddha Dha (ध)
Bb / A# Minor 7th 996.1 ¢ (465.1 Hz) 1017.6 ¢ (470.9 Hz) 1006.8 ¢ (468.0 Hz) 996.1 ¢ (465.1 Hz) 1000.0 ¢ (466.16 Hz) Komal Ni (नि)
B4 Major 7th 1109.8 ¢ (496.68 Hz) 1088.3 ¢ (490.55 Hz) 1082.9 ¢ (489.0 Hz) 1092.2 ¢ (491.7 Hz) 1100.0 ¢ (493.88 Hz) Śuddha Ni (नि)
C5 Octave 1200.0 ¢ (523.25 Hz) 1200.0 ¢ (523.25 Hz) 1200.0 ¢ (523.25 Hz) 1200.0 ¢ (523.25 Hz) 1200.0 ¢ (523.25 Hz) Tāra Sa (सं)

3. Deep Dive: How the Five Historical Temperaments Came to Be

From the monophonic monochords of ancient Greece to the sacred choral polyphony of the Renaissance, the organ keyboards of the Baroque, and the global industrial standardization of 12-TET. Complete step-by-step mathematical derivations for all 12 notes across all five systems.

1. Pythagorean Tuning (c. 500 BCE)

A. Historical Genesis: The Sacred Tetractys & Monochord Chant

Pythagorean tuning arose in ancient Greece in the 6th century BCE through the philosophical school of Pythagoras of Samos, later formalized in the Euclidean treatise Sectio Canonis (c. 300 BCE). Pythagoras investigated string acoustics using the monochord—a single string stretched over a movable wooden bridge. By dividing the string into simple integer lengths, he discovered that stopping the string at 1/2 produced the octave (2:1), stopping at 2/3 produced the fifth (3:2), and stopping at 3/4 produced the fourth (4:3).

To the Pythagoreans, this was divine: the numbers 1, 2, 3, and 4 comprised the sacred Tetractys, summing to 10 (the symbol of cosmic harmony and the "Music of the Spheres"). Consequently, Pythagorean acoustics strictly prohibited any prime numbers beyond 2 and 3.

During the European Middle Ages (c. 500–1400 CE), Pythagorean tuning reigned supreme. Medieval Christian plainchant (Gregorian chant) and early Gothic polyphony (such as the organum of Léonin and Pérotin at Notre Dame Cathedral, Paris) were sung in vast stone sanctuaries. In these reverberant acoustics, pure fourths (4:3) and pure fifths (3:2) rang like celestial bells. Thirds and sixths were considered harsh dissonances (discordiae) because their Pythagorean versions beat rapidly. Cadences resolved exclusively to bare, open fifths and octaves.

B. Mathematical Mechanism: The Chain of Pure Fifths

Every note in the Pythagorean system is generated by stacking pure fifths of ratio 3/2 (701.96 cents), and reducing octaves by dividing by 2 whenever the pitch exceeds the octave boundary.

The Pythagorean Chain (Centered on D):

Eb ↔ Bb ↔ F ↔ C ↔ G ↔ D ↔ A ↔ E ↔ B ↔ F# ↔ C# ↔ G#

Ascending 7 fifths from C generates: G → D → A → E → B → F# → C# → G#.
Descending 3 fifths (or ascending 3 fourths 4/3) from C generates: F → Bb → Eb.
This yields exactly 12 pitch classes. But because 12 pure fifths overshoot 7 octaves by the Pythagorean Comma (23.46 cents), the circle fails to close: the final interval between G# and Eb is forced into a mutilated Wolf Fifth of 678.49 cents (35.47 cents flat of a pure fifth!).

C. Step-by-Step Derivation of All 12 Notes

Starting from reference C4 = 261.63 Hz (0.0 cents, ratio 1/1):

  1. G4 (Fifth 1 Up): Multiply by 3/2 = 3/2 (1.50000). Cents: 1200 * log2(3/2) = 701.96 ¢. Freq: 261.63 * 1.5 = 392.44 Hz.
  2. D4 (Fifth 2 Up): (3/2) * (3/2) = 9/4. Exceeds octave; divide by 2 = 9/8 (1.12500). Cents: 203.91 ¢. Freq: 261.63 * (9/8) = 294.33 Hz. This is the pure Major Tone (Epogdoon).
  3. A4 (Fifth 3 Up): (9/8) * (3/2) = 27/16 (1.68750). Cents: 905.87 ¢. Freq: 261.63 * (27/16) = 441.49 Hz. Pythagorean Major Sixth.
  4. E4 (Fifth 4 Up): (27/16) * (3/2) = 81/32. Divide by 2 = 81/64 (1.26563). Cents: 407.82 ¢. Freq: 261.63 * (81/64) = 331.12 Hz. The Ditone! A full 21.51 ¢ sharper than pure 5/4 (386.31 ¢), creating an acoustic rattle of ~16 beats/sec.
  5. B4 (Fifth 5 Up): (81/64) * (3/2) = 243/128 (1.89844). Cents: 1109.78 ¢. Freq: 261.63 * (243/128) = 496.68 Hz. Major Seventh.
  6. F#4 (Fifth 6 Up): (243/128) * (3/2) = 729/256. Divide by 2 = 729/512 (1.42383). Cents: 611.73 ¢. Freq: 261.63 * (729/512) = 372.51 Hz. Pythagorean Tritone.
  7. C#4 (Fifth 7 Up): (729/512) * (3/2) = 2187/1024. Divide by 2 = 2187/2048 (1.06787). Cents: 90.22 ¢. Freq: 261.63 * (2187/2048) = 275.60 Hz. Chromatic Semitone (Apotome).
  8. G#4 (Fifth 8 Up): (2187/2048) * (3/2) = 6561/4096 (1.60181). Cents: 792.18 ¢. Freq: 261.63 * (6561/4096) = 413.31 Hz. Augmented Fifth.
  9. F4 (Fifth 1 Down): 1 / (3/2) = 2/3. Octave up: (2/3) * 2 = 4/3 (1.33333). Cents: 498.05 ¢. Freq: 261.63 * (4/3) = 348.83 Hz. Pure Fourth.
  10. Bb4 (Fifth 2 Down): (4/3) / (3/2) = 8/9. Octave up: (8/9) * 2 = 16/9 (1.77778). Cents: 996.09 ¢. Freq: 261.63 * (16/9) = 465.11 Hz. Pythagorean Minor Seventh.
  11. Eb4 (Fifth 3 Down): (16/9) / (3/2) = 32/27. Already in octave: 32/27 (1.18519). Cents: 294.13 ¢. Freq: 261.63 * (32/27) = 310.08 Hz. Pythagorean Minor Third (Semiditone).
  12. Ab4 (Fifth 4 Down, Alternative to G#): (32/27) / (3/2) = 64/81. Octave up: 128/81 (1.58025). Cents: 792.18 ¢ if G# (apotome from G) or 813.69 ¢ if Ab (limma from G).
Note Generation Step Exact Ratio Interval Cents (¢) Freq (Hz) vs 12-TET Acoustic Quality
C4Origin (1/1)1 / 1Tonic0.0 ¢261.63 Hz0.0 ¢Perfect fundamental unison
C#4+7 Fifths up2187 / 2048Chromatic Semitone90.2 ¢275.60 Hz-9.8 ¢Narrow, driving leading tone
D4+2 Fifths up9 / 8Major Tone203.9 ¢294.33 Hz+3.9 ¢Pure major second; clean melodic step
Eb4-3 Fifths down32 / 27Minor 3rd (Semiditone)294.1 ¢310.08 Hz-5.9 ¢Narrow minor third; sombre, sharp beating
E4+4 Fifths up81 / 64Major 3rd (Ditone)407.8 ¢331.12 Hz+7.8 ¢Extremely wide (+21.5 ¢ vs 5/4); 16 Hz rattle in triad
F4-1 Fifth down4 / 3Perfect 4th498.0 ¢348.83 Hz-2.0 ¢Acoustically pure fourth (beatless)
F#4+6 Fifths up729 / 512Tritone611.7 ¢372.51 Hz+11.7 ¢Sharp, piercing augmented fourth
G4+1 Fifth up3 / 2Perfect 5th702.0 ¢392.44 Hz+2.0 ¢Acoustically pure fifth (beatless)
G#4+8 Fifths up6561 / 4096Augmented 5th792.2 ¢413.31 Hz-7.8 ¢Border of the circle
A4+3 Fifths up27 / 16Major 6th905.9 ¢441.49 Hz+5.9 ¢Wide Pythagorean major sixth
Bb4-2 Fifths down16 / 9Minor 7th996.1 ¢465.11 Hz-3.9 ¢Standard Pythagorean minor seventh
B4+5 Fifths up243 / 128Major 7th1109.8 ¢496.68 Hz+9.8 ¢Sharp leading tone to C5
C5Octave2 / 1Octave1200.0 ¢523.25 Hz0.0 ¢Pure octave (2:1)
WOLF G#4 to Eb5 262144 / 177147 Wolf Fifth 678.5 ¢ — -21.5 ¢ Catastrophic flat fifth (flat by 23.5 ¢ comma); howling discord

2. Just Intonation (5-Limit Ptolemaic, Renaissance)

A. Historical Genesis: The Renaissance Polyphonic Revolution

By the 15th century, Western music underwent an aesthetic revolution. English composers like John Dunstable (c. 1390–1453) brought the contenance angloise ("English guise") to continental Europe—a luscious choral style saturated with parallel sweet thirds and sixths. Franco-Flemish masters like Guillaume Du Fay, Johannes Ockeghem, and Josquin des Prez transformed the major triad into the cornerstone of European art music.

Under Pythagorean tuning, these triads were acoustically unusable: the ditone third (81/64 = 407.82 cents) clashed with vocal harmonics, producing a rough, unpleasant beating. Theorists realized that human vocalists intuitively flattened their thirds toward the natural 5th harmonic of the overtone series: ratio 5/4 (386.31 cents).

In 1482, the Spanish mathematician and theorist Bartolomé Ramos de Pareja published Musica Practica in Bologna, boldly abandoning the sacred Pythagorean monochord divisions and proposing 5/4 for the major third and 6/5 for the minor third. In 1558, Gioseffo Zarlino of Venice formalized this in Le Istitutioni Harmoniche by expanding the ancient Tetractys (1–4) into the Senario (numbers 1 to 6). For Zarlino, any interval formed by ratios of the numbers 1 through 6 was natural, divine, and consonantal. The ideal major triad was defined by the harmonic proportion 4 : 5 : 6 (1.000 : 1.250 : 1.500).

B. Mathematical Mechanism: The Three Pure Harmonic Triads

5-Limit Just Intonation constructs the entire diatonic scale around the three fundamental harmonic pillars of tonal music: the Tonic (C), the Subdominant (F), and the Dominant (G). Each triad is tuned to the exact pure proportion 4 : 5 : 6:

  • Tonic Triad (C - E - G): C(4) : E(5) : G(6) → E = 5/4 (386.3 ¢), G = 6/4 = 3/2 (702.0 ¢).
  • Subdominant Triad (F - A - C): F(4) : A(5) : C(6) → Since C = 1, F = 4/6 = 2/3 (transposed up an octave = 4/3, 498.0 ¢), and A = (4/3) * (5/4) = 5/3 (884.4 ¢).
  • Dominant Triad (G - B - D): G(4) : B(5) : D(6) → G = 3/2. Therefore, B = (3/2) * (5/4) = 15/8 (1088.3 ¢), and D = (3/2) * (6/4) = 9/4 (transposed down an octave = 9/8, 203.9 ¢).

C. Step-by-Step Derivation of All 12 Notes

  1. C4: Tonic fundamental = 1/1 (0.0 ¢, 261.63 Hz).
  2. C#4 / Db4: Diatonic semitone below D or minor second above C: 16/15 (inversion of major seventh 15/8): 2 / (15/8) = 16/15 (1.06667) → 111.73 ¢ → 279.07 Hz.
  3. D4: Dominant fifth of G: (3/2 * 3/2) / 2 = 9/8 (1.12500) → 203.91 ¢ → 294.33 Hz. (Major tone).
  4. Eb4: Pure minor third from C: 6/5 (1.20000) → 315.64 ¢ → 313.95 Hz.
  5. E4: Pure major third of the tonic triad: 5/4 (1.25000) → 386.31 ¢ → 327.03 Hz. Completely beatless!
  6. F4: Subdominant root (pure fourth below C octave): 2 / (3/2) = 4/3 (1.33333) → 498.05 ¢ → 348.83 Hz.
  7. F#4: Pure major third above D: (9/8) * (5/4) = 45/32 (1.40625) → 590.22 ¢ → 367.92 Hz.
  8. G4: Pure fifth of the tonic triad: 3/2 (1.50000) → 701.96 ¢ → 392.44 Hz.
  9. Ab4: Pure minor sixth (inversion of pure 5/4 third): 2 / (5/4) = 8/5 (1.60000) → 813.69 ¢ → 418.60 Hz.
  10. A4: Pure major third of the subdominant triad: (4/3) * (5/4) = 5/3 (1.66667) → 884.36 ¢ → 436.05 Hz.
  11. Bb4: Harmonic minor seventh: (3/2) * (6/5) / (2) ... or 9/5 = 9/5 (1.80000) → 1017.60 ¢ → 470.93 Hz. (Acoustically pure minor 7th, identical to Indian Komal Ni!).
  12. B4: Pure major third of the dominant triad: (3/2) * (5/4) = 15/8 (1.87500) → 1088.27 ¢ → 490.55 Hz.
  13. C5: Octave = 2/1 (1200.0 ¢, 523.25 Hz).
Note Triad Origin Ratio Interval Cents (¢) Freq (Hz) vs 12-TET Acoustic Quality
C4Tonic Root1 / 1Tonic0.0 ¢261.63 Hz0.0 ¢Pure reference anchor
C#4 / DbInversion of 15/816 / 15Diatonic Semitone111.7 ¢279.07 Hz+11.7 ¢Wide, sweet major semitone
D4Dominant 5th9 / 8Major Tone (T)203.9 ¢294.33 Hz+3.9 ¢Pure major whole tone
Eb4Minor 3rd on C6 / 5Minor 3rd315.6 ¢313.95 Hz+15.6 ¢Pure minor third (beatless)
E4Tonic 3rd5 / 4Major 3rd386.3 ¢327.03 Hz-13.7 ¢Pure natural third: zero beating, completely serene
F4Subdominant Root4 / 3Perfect 4th498.0 ¢348.83 Hz-2.0 ¢Pure subdominant anchor
F#4Major 3rd on D45 / 32Augmented 4th590.2 ¢367.92 Hz-9.8 ¢Pure harmonic tritone
G4Tonic 5th / Dom Root3 / 2Perfect 5th702.0 ¢392.44 Hz+2.0 ¢Pure beatless fifth
Ab4Inversion of 5/48 / 5Minor 6th813.7 ¢418.60 Hz+13.7 ¢Pure minor sixth
A4Subdominant 3rd5 / 3Major 6th884.4 ¢436.05 Hz-15.6 ¢Pure major sixth (21.5 ¢ flatter than Pyth 27/16!)
Bb4Harmonic 7th9 / 5Minor 7th1017.6 ¢470.93 Hz+17.6 ¢Pure resonant minor 7th (Indian Komal Ni)
B4Dominant 3rd15 / 8Major 7th1088.3 ¢490.55 Hz-11.7 ¢Pure leading tone in G major
C5Octave2 / 1Octave1200.0 ¢523.25 Hz0.0 ¢Pure octave (2:1)
WOLF D4 to A4 Triad 40 / 27Defective 5th 680.5 ¢ — -19.5 ¢ Flat by 21.5 ¢ Syntonic Comma; D minor triad is unplayable!

D. The Fatal Dilemma of Just Intonation

Why Just Intonation Failed on Keyboards:
  1. Two Different Whole Tones: The distance C to D is a Major Tone (9/8 = 203.9 cents), but D to E is a Minor Tone (10/9 = 182.4 cents). The difference is exactly the Syntonic Comma: (9/8) / (10/9) = 81/80 = 21.51 cents!
  2. The D-Minor Wolf: The fifth above D should be A. But D is 9/8 (203.9 ¢) and A is 5/3 (884.4 ¢). The interval D to A is: (5/3) / (9/8) = 40/27 = 680.45 cents. This is 21.51 cents flat of a pure fifth! Playing a simple ii-V-I cadence (Dm - G7 - C) produces an agonizing out-of-tune howl.
  3. Pitch Drift (Syntonic Pump): If a choir sings a harmonic progression that shifts between major and minor tones, their overall pitch drops by 21.5 cents with every cycle. For fixed-key instruments like organs and harpsichords, pure Just Intonation was a logistical impossibility.

3. Quarter-Comma Meantone Temperament (16th–17th Century)

A. Historical Genesis: The Keyboard Compromise

As pipe organs, harpsichords, and virginals became central to European sacred and secular music in the 16th century, musicians demanded an answer to the Just Intonation crisis. A keyboard cannot dynamically alter pitch like a choir. How could an organist play pure major thirds without suffering the 40/27 wolf on D or having two different keys for D?

In 1523, the Venetian theorist Pietro Aaron published Toscanello de la musica, describing a brilliant tuning practice already used by master organ builders. In 1577, the blind Spanish organist and theorist Francisco de Salinas published the complete mathematical formulation in De musica libri septem at Salamanca: Quarter-Comma Meantone Temperament.

Meantone was the undisputed sovereign tuning of European keyboard music for over two centuries, shaping the masterpieces of William Byrd, Girolamo Frescobaldi, Jan Pieterszoon Sweelinck, Heinrich Schütz, and Dieterich Buxtehude.

B. Mathematical Mechanism: Taming the Syntonic Comma

Salinas identified the exact acoustic geometry:

In Pythagorean tuning, four stacked fifths generate the major third:
(3/2)^4 / 4 = 81/64 = 407.82 cents
The error against the pure natural third (5/4 = 386.31 cents) is the Syntonic Comma:
81/80 = 21.51 cents

Salinas reasoned: if 4 fifths produce an error of 1 comma, simply flatten (temper) each fifth by exactly 1/4 of the syntonic comma:
1/4 Comma = 21.506 / 4 = 5.377 cents
Quarter-Comma Tempered Fifth Q = 701.955 - 5.377 = 696.578 cents (ratio = 5^(1/4) ≈ 1.49534878)

When four such tempered fifths are stacked:
4 * 696.578 - 2400 = 2786.312 - 2400 = 386.314 cents = EXACT PURE 5/4 MAJOR THIRD!

Furthermore, the whole step is the exact geometric mean of the major tone (9/8) and minor tone (10/9):
Mean Tone = 386.314 / 2 = 193.157 cents (ratio = sqrt(5)/2 ≈ 1.118034). Hence the name: Mean-Tone!

C. Step-by-Step Derivation of All 12 Notes

Meantone tunes a chain of 11 quarter-comma fifths (Q = 696.578 cents) traditionally centered on D or C, running from Eb up to G#:

  1. C4: Origin = 0.00 ¢ (261.63 Hz).
  2. G4 (+1 Fifth): 0 + 696.58 = 696.58 ¢ → 391.21 Hz. (Narrowed by 5.4 ¢).
  3. D4 (+2 Fifths): 696.58 + 696.58 - 1200 = 193.16 ¢ → 292.45 Hz. (The Mean Tone!).
  4. A4 (+3 Fifths): 193.16 + 696.58 = 889.74 ¢ → 437.38 Hz.
  5. E4 (+4 Fifths): 889.74 + 696.58 - 1200 = 386.31 ¢ → 327.03 Hz. Exact pure 5/4 third! Zero beating.
  6. B4 (+5 Fifths): 386.31 + 696.58 = 1082.89 ¢ → 489.00 Hz. Pure major third above G (696.58 + 386.31 = 1082.89 ¢).
  7. F#4 (+6 Fifths): 1082.89 + 696.58 - 1200 = 579.47 ¢ → 365.64 Hz. Pure major third above D (193.16 + 386.31 = 579.47 ¢).
  8. C#4 (+7 Fifths): 579.47 + 696.58 - 1200 = 76.05 ¢ → 273.35 Hz. Pure major third above A (889.74 + 386.31 - 1200 = 76.05 ¢).
  9. G#4 (+8 Fifths): 76.05 + 696.58 = 772.63 ¢ → 408.74 Hz. Pure major third above E (386.31 + 386.31 = 772.63 ¢).
  10. F4 (-1 Fifth down): 1200 - 696.58 = 503.42 ¢ → 349.91 Hz. Pure major third below A (889.74 - 386.31 = 503.42 ¢).
  11. Bb4 (-2 Fifths down): 503.42 - 696.58 + 1200 = 1006.84 ¢ → 468.01 Hz. Pure major third below D (193.16 + 1200 - 386.31 = 1006.84 ¢).
  12. Eb4 (-3 Fifths down): 1006.84 - 696.58 = 310.26 ¢ → 312.92 Hz. Pure major third below G (696.58 - 386.31 = 310.26 ¢).
Note Fifth Step Ratio Formula Interval Cents (¢) Freq (Hz) vs 12-TET Acoustic Quality
C401.00000Tonic0.0 ¢261.63 Hz0.0 ¢Tonic center
C#4+7 Q5^(7/4) / 8Chromatic Semitone76.1 ¢273.35 Hz-24.0 ¢Very narrow semitone; pure third to A
D4+2 Qsqrt(5) / 2Mean Tone193.2 ¢292.45 Hz-6.8 ¢Exact mean of 9/8 and 10/9
Eb4-3 Q4 / 5^(3/4)Minor 3rd310.3 ¢312.92 Hz+10.3 ¢Pure third below G
E4+4 Q5 / 4Major 3rd386.3 ¢327.03 Hz-13.7 ¢Pure 5/4 third: heavenly stillness, zero beats
F4-1 Q2 / 5^(1/4)Perfect 4th503.4 ¢349.91 Hz+3.4 ¢Slightly wide fourth; pure third to A
F#4+6 Q5*sqrt(5) / 8Tritone579.5 ¢365.64 Hz-20.5 ¢Pure third to D
G4+1 Q5^(1/4)Tempered 5th696.6 ¢391.21 Hz-3.4 ¢Tempered fifth (-5.4 ¢; very slow, gentle beat)
G#4+8 Q25 / 16Augmented 5th772.6 ¢408.74 Hz-27.4 ¢Pure third to E; sharp limit of keyboard
A4+3 Q5^(3/4) / 2Major 6th889.7 ¢437.38 Hz-10.3 ¢Pure third to F
Bb4-2 Q4 / sqrt(5)Minor 7th1006.8 ¢468.01 Hz+6.8 ¢Pure third below D
B4+5 Q5^(5/4) / 4Major 7th1082.9 ¢489.00 Hz-17.1 ¢Pure third to G
C5Octave2.00000Octave1200.0 ¢523.25 Hz0.0 ¢Pure octave
WOLF G#4 to Eb5 Interval Gap Wolf Fifth 737.6 ¢ — +37.6 ¢ Massively sharp (+35.7 ¢ vs pure 3/2, +41 ¢ vs Q); grotesque screeching

D. The Price of Meantone: The Great Wolf & Key Confinement

Because eleven fifths were narrowed by 5.38 cents each, the total contraction was 11 * 5.38 = 59.18 cents. The remaining gap between G# and Eb was forced to absorb all this contraction plus the Pythagorean comma:
Wolf Fifth = 701.96 + (11 * 5.377) - 23.46 = 737.63 cents!
This wolf was so agonizing that if an organist played an Ab major chord (which required G# as the third) or an Eb major chord involving G#, the clash sounded like a snarling wolf. Organ builders in Italy and Germany actually built keyboards with split black keys (subsemitones: separate levers for D#/Eb and G#/Ab) to escape the wolf! Composers were trapped in a strict harmonic box: keys with more than 3 sharps (A, E, B) or 2 flats (Bb, Eb) were strictly forbidden.

4. Well Temperament (Werckmeister III, 1691)

A. Historical Genesis: The Dawn of Total Modulation & Bach

By the late 17th century, High Baroque composers rebelled against the prison of meantone. Opera, cantata, and organ music demanded adventurous, dramatic modulations: shifting from C minor to Ab major, or plunging into F# minor to depict grief, death, and resurrection. Organists could not retune massive multi-pipe cathedral organs mid-performance.

In 1691, the organist, composer, and acoustic theorist Andreas Werckmeister published Musicalische Temperatur in Quedlinburg, Germany. Werckmeister proposed a revolutionary concept: the circulating temperament (Wohltemperiert, or "Well Temperament").

Rather than dumping all comma errors into a single catastrophic wolf fifth, Werckmeister distributed the 23.46-cent Pythagorean comma across several fifths in unequal proportions. The result was historic: the wolf was completely banished, all 24 major and minor keys became fully playable without retuning, yet each key retained a distinct emotional personality or "key color" (Affekt).

In 1722 (and again in 1742), Johann Sebastian Bach crowned this acoustic victory with his masterwork, Das Wohltemperierte Clavier (The Well-Tempered Clavier, BWV 846–893). Bach wrote 24 Preludes and Fugues in Book I and another 24 in Book II—one pair for every single major and minor key from C major to B minor—to demonstrate that music could now voyage across the entire universe of harmony.

B. Mathematical Mechanism: The Four Tempered Fifths of Werckmeister III

Among several temperaments devised by Werckmeister, his "Number III" (often designated Werckmeister I in modern German catalogues) is the most celebrated:

  • Total Comma to Distribute: Pythagorean Comma = 23.460 cents.
  • The Four Tempered Fifths: Werckmeister selected four critical diatonic fifths—C–G, G–D, D–A, and B–F#—and flattened each by exactly 1/4 of the Pythagorean comma:
    1/4 Comma = 23.460 / 4 = 5.865 cents
    Tempered Fifth = 701.955 - 5.865 = 696.090 cents
  • The Eight Pure Fifths: The remaining eight fifths are kept completely pure (701.955 cents):
    A–E, E–B, F#–C#, C#–G#, G#–D#(Eb), Eb–Bb, Bb–F, and F–C.
  • The Balance: 4 * (-5.865 ¢) = -23.460 ¢. The sum of all 12 fifths equals exactly 7 octaves: 4 * 696.090 + 8 * 701.955 = 8400.00 cents. Zero wolf fifth!

C. Step-by-Step Derivation of All 12 Notes

Tracing the circle of fifths step-by-step from C4 = 0.00 ¢ (261.63 Hz):

  1. C4: Tonic reference = 0.00 ¢ → 261.63 Hz.
  2. G4 (Tempered Fifth 1): 0 + 696.09 = 696.09 ¢ → 391.10 Hz. (Narrowed by 5.9 ¢).
  3. D4 (Tempered Fifth 2): 696.09 + 696.09 - 1200 = 192.18 ¢ → 292.28 Hz. (Narrowed by 5.9 ¢).
  4. A4 (Tempered Fifth 3): 192.18 + 696.09 = 888.27 ¢ → 437.01 Hz. (Narrowed by 5.9 ¢).
  5. E4 (Pure Fifth from A): 888.27 + 701.96 - 1200 = 390.22 ¢ → 327.77 Hz. A brilliant result! Because C-G, G-D, and D-A were all tempered, the major third C-E is 390.22 ¢—only 3.9 cents wider than pure 5/4 (386.31 ¢). C major sounds sweet, peaceful, and almost beatless!
  6. B4 (Pure Fifth from E): 390.22 + 701.96 = 1092.18 ¢ → 491.64 Hz.
  7. F#4 (Tempered Fifth 4): 1092.18 + 696.09 - 1200 = 588.27 ¢ → 367.51 Hz. (Final tempered fifth).
  8. C#4 (Pure Fifth from F#): 588.27 + 701.96 - 1200 = 90.22 ¢ → 275.60 Hz.
  9. G#4 (Pure Fifth from C#): 90.22 + 701.96 = 792.18 ¢ → 413.31 Hz.
  10. Eb4 / D#4 (Pure Fifth from G#): 792.18 + 701.96 - 1200 = 294.13 ¢ → 310.08 Hz.
  11. Bb4 (Pure Fifth from Eb): 294.13 + 701.96 = 996.09 ¢ → 465.11 Hz.
  12. F4 (Pure Fifth from Bb): 996.09 + 701.96 - 1200 = 498.05 ¢ → 348.83 Hz.
  13. Check: F to C: 498.05 + 701.96 = 1200.00 ¢. An exact pure fifth of 701.96 cents closes the circle!
Note Fifth Generator Cents Calculation Interval Cents (¢) Freq (Hz) vs 12-TET Character & Triad Third
C4Origin0.00 ¢Tonic0.0 ¢261.63 Hz0.0 ¢Home base; C-E third is sweet (390.2 ¢)
C#4Pure from F#588.27 + 701.96 - 1200Minor 2nd90.2 ¢275.60 Hz-9.8 ¢Tight leading tone; Db major is fiery
D4Tempered from G696.09 + 696.09 - 1200Major 2nd192.2 ¢292.28 Hz-7.8 ¢Tempered step; D-F# third is 396.1 ¢
Eb4Pure from G#792.18 + 701.96 - 1200Minor 3rd294.1 ¢310.08 Hz-5.9 ¢Eb-G third is 402.0 ¢; solemn, grave
E4Pure from A888.27 + 701.96 - 1200Major 3rd390.2 ¢327.77 Hz-9.8 ¢Near-pure third (only +3.9 ¢ vs 5/4); very calm
F4Pure from Bb996.09 + 701.96 - 1200Perfect 4th498.0 ¢348.83 Hz-2.0 ¢F-A third is 390.2 ¢; pastoral, warm
F#4Tempered from B1092.18 + 696.09 - 1200Tritone588.3 ¢367.51 Hz-11.7 ¢F#-A# third is 407.8 ¢ (Pythagorean!); brilliant
G4Tempered from C0.00 + 696.09Perfect 5th696.1 ¢391.10 Hz-3.9 ¢G-B third is 396.1 ¢; radiant, noble
Ab4 / G#Pure from C#90.22 + 701.96Minor 6th792.2 ¢413.31 Hz-7.8 ¢Ab-C third is 407.8 ¢; tragic, profound
A4Tempered from D192.18 + 696.09Major 6th888.3 ¢437.01 Hz-11.7 ¢A-C# third is 402.0 ¢; spirited, joyful
Bb4Pure from Eb294.13 + 701.96Minor 7th996.1 ¢465.11 Hz-3.9 ¢Bb-D third is 396.1 ¢; magnificent, regal
B4Pure from E390.22 + 701.96Major 7th1092.2 ¢491.64 Hz-7.8 ¢B-D# third is 402.0 ¢; sharp, piercing
C5Octave1200.00 ¢Octave1200.0 ¢523.25 Hz0.0 ¢Pure octave (2:1)

D. The Aesthetics of Key Color (Affektenlehre)

Notice how the major thirds vary systematically across the keys in Werckmeister III:
  • C Major (C–E) and F Major (F–A): Major third = 390.2 cents (near pure 5/4). Mood: Purity, pastoral calm, reverence.
  • G Major (G–B), D Major (D–F#), and Bb Major (Bb–D): Major third = 396.1 cents (intermediate). Mood: Joy, vitality, majesty.
  • A Major (A–C#), E Major (E–G#), and Eb Major (Eb–G): Major third = 402.0 cents. Mood: Passion, spiritual yearning.
  • F# Major (F#–A#), C# Major (C#–E#), and Ab Major (Ab–C): Major third = 407.8 cents (full Pythagorean ditone). Mood: Extreme brilliance, piercing intensity, grief.
To Baroque composers, all keys being different was not a flaw—it was the supreme expressive virtue of music!

5. 12-Tone Equal Temperament (12-TET)

A. Historical Genesis: Straight Frets, Abacuses, and the Industrial Era

While keyboard players cherished the subtle key colors of well temperament, players of fretted instruments—the lute, viol, guitar, and the Chinese pipa—faced a stubborn mechanical obstacle. On a lute or guitar, frets are tied straight across the wooden neck beneath all six or twelve strings. If a fret is positioned for a pure major third on one string, it simultaneously ruins the notes on adjacent strings tuned to fourths!

In 1581, Vincenzo Galilei (lutenist, theorist of the Florentine Camerata, and father of the astronomer Galileo Galilei) published Dialogo della musica antica et della moderna. Vincenzo argued fiercely against Zarlino's pure fifths, proposing that lutes must use an equal semitone ratio of 18:17 (about 98.95 cents per fret) so that frets could run perpendicular across all strings without unisons clashing.

The exact mathematical calculation of equal temperament requires taking the twelfth root of two (2^(1/12)). In 1584, during the Ming Dynasty in China, Prince Zhu Zaiyu (朱載堉) accomplished this historic feat in his monumental treatise Lüxue Xinshuo ("A New Theory of the Science of Pitch Pipes"). Using an enormous 81-position counting abacus, Zhu calculated the ratio of equal temperament to 25 decimal places:
2^(1/12) ≈ 1.059463094359295264561825
Zhu cast a set of 12 precisely tuned bronze pitch pipes, becoming the first human in history to achieve exact acoustic equal temperament.

In Europe, the mathematician Simon Stevin calculated 2^(1/12) around 1605 (published in Vande Spiegheling der Singconst), followed by Marin Mersenne in Harmonie Universelle (1636). Yet European keyboard players resisted equal temperament for over two centuries because its thirds were noticeably coarse.

Equal temperament's ultimate victory was driven by the 19th-century Industrial Revolution:

  • Mass Piano Manufacturing: Factories like Broadwood, Érard, and Steinway & Sons needed a single universal tuning standard that factory technicians could apply uniformly to tens of thousands of cast-iron frame pianos.
  • Late-Romantic Chromaticism: Franz Liszt, Richard Wagner, Frédéric Chopin, and Gustav Mahler pushed harmonic modulation to the extreme, treating all 12 semitones as equal democratic entities without a fixed home key.
  • Orchestral Unification: Woodwinds, brass valves, and fixed keyboards needed to play together in giant concert halls without intonational conflicts.

B. Mathematical Mechanism: The Twelfth Root of Two

In 12-TET, the octave is divided into 12 mathematically identical geometric steps:

Frequency Ratio per Semitone: r = 2^(1/12) ≈ 1.059463094359...
Cents per Semitone: 1200 / 12 = Exactly 100.0000 cents
Frequency of Semitone k: f(k) = f(0) * 2^(k/12)

The 23.46-cent Pythagorean comma is divided strictly equally among all 12 fifths:
Tempered Fifth = 701.955 - (23.460 / 12) = 701.955 - 1.955 = Exactly 700.00 cents.

C. Step-by-Step Derivation of All 12 Notes

Calculated from standard reference C4 = 261.6256 Hz (0.0 cents):

  1. C4 (k=0): 261.6256 * 2^(0/12) = 0.00 ¢ → 261.63 Hz. Ratio 1.000000.
  2. C#4 (k=1): 261.6256 * 2^(1/12) = 100.00 ¢ → 277.18 Hz. Ratio 1.059463. (+9.8 ¢ vs Pyth, -11.7 ¢ vs Just, +24.0 ¢ vs Meantone).
  3. D4 (k=2): 261.6256 * 2^(2/12) = 200.00 ¢ → 293.66 Hz. Ratio 1.122462. (-3.9 ¢ vs Pyth/Just, +6.8 ¢ vs Meantone).
  4. Eb4 (k=3): 261.6256 * 2^(3/12) = 300.00 ¢ → 311.13 Hz. Ratio 1.189207. (+5.9 ¢ vs Pyth, -15.6 ¢ vs Just, -10.3 ¢ vs Meantone).
  5. E4 (k=4): 261.6256 * 2^(4/12) = 400.00 ¢ → 329.63 Hz. Ratio 1.259921. +13.69 ¢ sharper than pure 5/4 third! Causes ~10.3 beats/second acoustic rattle in C-E.
  6. F4 (k=5): 261.6256 * 2^(5/12) = 500.00 ¢ → 349.23 Hz. Ratio 1.334840. (+2.0 ¢ vs Pyth/Just, -3.4 ¢ vs Meantone).
  7. F#4 (k=6): 261.6256 * 2^(6/12) = 600.00 ¢ → 369.99 Hz. Ratio sqrt(2) ≈ 1.414214. Exact midpoint of the octave.
  8. G4 (k=7): 261.6256 * 2^(7/12) = 700.00 ¢ → 391.99 Hz. Ratio 1.498307. 1.96 ¢ flat of pure 3/2 fifth (slow, subtle beat of ~0.9 Hz, practically imperceptible).
  9. Ab4 (k=8): 261.6256 * 2^(8/12) = 800.00 ¢ → 415.30 Hz. Ratio 1.587401. (-13.7 ¢ vs Just, +27.4 ¢ vs Meantone).
  10. A4 (k=9): 261.6256 * 2^(9/12) = 900.00 ¢ → 440.00 Hz. Ratio 1.681793. Concert pitch anchor!
  11. Bb4 (k=10): 261.6256 * 2^(10/12) = 1000.00 ¢ → 466.16 Hz. Ratio 1.781797. (-17.6 ¢ vs Just 9/5).
  12. B4 (k=11): 261.6256 * 2^(11/12) = 1100.00 ¢ → 493.88 Hz. Ratio 1.887749. (+11.7 ¢ vs Just 15/8).
  13. C5 (k=12): 261.6256 * 2^(12/12) = 1200.00 ¢ → 523.25 Hz. Ratio 2.000000. Pure octave.
Note Exponent k Power Ratio 2^(k/12) Interval Cents (¢) Freq (Hz) vs Pure Just Acoustic Character
C401.000000Tonic0.0 ¢261.63 Hz0.0 ¢Universal reference pitch
C#411.059463Minor 2nd100.0 ¢277.18 Hz-11.7 ¢Uniform semitone step
D421.122462Major 2nd200.0 ¢293.66 Hz-3.9 ¢Uniform whole tone step
Eb431.189207Minor 3rd300.0 ¢311.13 Hz-15.6 ¢Significantly flat vs natural 6/5 (315.6 ¢)
E441.259921Major 3rd400.0 ¢329.63 Hz+13.7 ¢Audibly sharp vs pure 5/4; beats at 10.3 Hz in C4-E4
F451.334840Perfect 4th500.0 ¢349.23 Hz+2.0 ¢Very clean fourth (+1.96 ¢)
F#461.414214Tritone600.0 ¢369.99 Hz+9.8 ¢Exact square root of 2 (octave center)
G471.498307Perfect 5th700.0 ¢391.99 Hz-2.0 ¢Nearly pure fifth (-1.96 ¢; slow 0.9 Hz wave)
Ab481.587401Minor 6th800.0 ¢415.30 Hz-13.7 ¢Inversion of sharp major third
A491.681793Major 6th900.0 ¢440.00 Hz+15.6 ¢Global Concert Pitch Standard (ISO 16)
Bb4101.781797Minor 7th1000.0 ¢466.16 Hz-17.6 ¢Noticeably flat vs pure 9/5 harmonic seventh
B4111.887749Major 7th1100.0 ¢493.88 Hz+11.7 ¢Sharp leading tone
C5122.000000Octave1200.0 ¢523.25 Hz0.0 ¢Exact pure octave (2:1)

D. The Double-Edged Sword of 12-TET & The Harmonium Clash in India

The Acoustic Price:

12-TET democratized harmony at a severe acoustic cost:

  • The Death of Key Color: In 12-TET, every interval and chord is mathematically identical in every key. The poignant difference between the pastoral serenity of C major and the sharp brilliance of F# major vanished. As the acoustic physicist Hermann von Helmholtz wrote in 1863: "Equal temperament is a compromise... the ear has been systematically blunted to the beating of imperfect thirds."
  • Clash with Eastern Microtones & The Harmonium Ban: When Christian missionaries and British colonial administrators introduced the 12-TET French harmonium to India in the mid-19th century, it was embraced for its loud volume and ease of teaching. But Indian classical music is founded on 22 pure microtonal śrutis and fluid vocal glides (mīṇḍ). The rigid 12-TET metal reeds could not play the pure 386.3-cent Gāndhāra (Ga) or 1017.6-cent Niṣāda (Ni), nor could they glide between notes. Rabindranath Tagore condemned it as a cultural and musical blight: "The harmonium, that bane of Indian music, has done more to corrupt our musical ear than anything else." In 1940, John Foulds and Lionel Fielden enacted a total ban on harmoniums across All India Radio (AIR), which lasted 31 years until 1971! Full acoustic and political analysis is in Eastern Tunings: The Harmonium Controversy.

4. Primary Sources & References

Historical treatises, landmark compositions, and foundational acoustics scholarship across Western music history.

Primary Historical Treatises

  1. Euclid (attributed): Sectio Canonis (The Division of the Monochord, c. 300 BCE).
    Earliest surviving mathematical demonstration that six pure whole tones (9/8)^6 exceed the octave (2/1) by the Pythagorean comma (531441 / 524288 = 23.46 cents). English translation and commentary by Andrew Barker in Greek Musical Writings II: Harmonic and Acoustic Theory (Cambridge University Press, 1989).
  2. Claudius Ptolemy: Harmonica (Ἁρμονικά, c. 150 CE).
    Book III, formulating the Syntonon Diatonic (Intense Diatonic: 16/15, 9/8, 10/9), which introduced the natural 5:4 pure major third into formal European tuning. Critical translation by Jon Solomon, Ptolemy's Harmonics (Brill, 2000).
  3. Bartolomé Ramos de Pareja: Musica Practica (Bologna, 1482).
    The first Renaissance theorist to openly propose 5:4 and 6:5 for major and minor thirds on the monochord, launching the transition from Pythagorean tuning to Just Intonation. Edited and translated by Clement A. Miller (American Institute of Musicology, 1993).
  4. Gioseffo Zarlino: Le Istitutioni Harmoniche (Venice, 1558).
    Book III, formalizing the senario (numbers 1–6) as the harmonic foundation of triadic Just Intonation and vocal polyphony.
  5. Pietro Aaron: Toscanello de la musica (Venice, 1523).
    Earliest explicit instructions for setting quarter-comma meantone temperament on keyboard instruments.
  6. Francisco de Salinas: De musica libri septem (Salamanca, 1577).
    Exhaustive mathematical analysis of meantone temperaments, demonstrating that four fifths narrowed by 1/4 syntonic comma yield an exact pure major third (5/4).
  7. Andreas Werckmeister: Musicalische Temperatur (Quedlinburg, 1691).
    The landmark formulation of circulating well temperaments (Werckmeister III, IV, and V), eliminating wolf fifths and making all 24 keys playable without retuning.
  8. Johann Sebastian Bach: Das Wohltemperierte Clavier (The Well-Tempered Clavier, Book I 1722, Book II 1742, BWV 846–893).
    The monumental artistic testament composed to demonstrate the expressive key color (Affekt) of well-tempered tuning across all 24 major and minor keys.
  9. Prince Zhu Zaiyu (朱載堉): Lüxue Xinshuo (A New Theory of the Science of the Pitch Pipes, 1584, Ming Dynasty China).
    The world's first exact mathematical calculation of 12-Tone Equal Temperament using an 81-position abacus to extract twelfth roots of two to 25 decimal places.
  10. Simon Stevin: Vande Spiegheling der Singconst (On the Theory of the Art of Singing, c. 1605, Netherlands).
    Earliest European mathematical derivation of 12-tone equal temperament.

Acoustics & Modern Scholarship

  1. Hermann von Helmholtz: Die Lehre von den Tonempfindungen als physiologische Grundlage für die Theorie der Musik (1863).
    Translated into English as On the Sensations of Tone as a Physiological Basis for the Theory of Music by Alexander J. Ellis (Longmans, Green, and Co., 1875; Dover reprint, 1954). The foundational masterwork of musical acoustics, containing Ellis's invention and definition of the modern logarithmic cent (1200 cents per octave).
  2. J. Murray Barbour: Tuning and Temperament: A Historical Survey (Michigan State College Press, 1951; Dover Publications, 2004).
    The definitive modern academic history of Western tuning systems, calculating cent values and comma distributions across all major historical temperaments.
  3. Mark Lindley: Lutes, Viols and Temperaments (Cambridge University Press, 1984) and "Temperaments" in The New Grove Dictionary of Music and Musicians.
    Authoritative modern reference on Renaissance and Baroque performance practice and tuning.
  4. Ross W. Duffin: How Equal Temperament Ruined Harmony (and Why You Should Care) (W. W. Norton & Company, 2007).
    Engaging historical analysis of the musical trade-offs of equal temperament vs. historical temperaments.