2.23

स्वस्वामिशक्त्योः स्वरूपोपलब्धिहेतुः संयोगः

sva-svāmi-śaktyoḥ svarūpopalabdhi-hetuḥ saṃyogaḥ

The line

Joining is the cause of recognizing the two powers, what is owned and the owner.

नेपालीमा

स्व र स्वामी, यी दुई शक्तिलाई चिन्ने कारण संयोग हो।

Where it sits

2.17 called the joining the cause of what is to be avoided. This line adds the other half. The same joining is how the two powers come to be known. It is not a mistake with no function. 2.24 will still say its own cause is ignorance. Both can be true: ignorance causes the joining, and the joining causes the recognition.

Split: sva (स्व) + svāmi (स्वामि) + śaktyoḥ (शक्त्योः) + svarūpa (स्वरूप) + upalabdhi (उपलब्धि) + hetuḥ (हेतुः) + saṃyogaḥ (संयोगः)

Sanskrit, in depth

The words

WordGrammarSense
sva (स्व)stemwhat is owned. The seen, the power that is possessed.
svāmi (स्वामि)stemthe owner. The seer, the power that possesses.
śaktyoḥ (शक्त्योः)genitive dualof the two powers. The same dual as in 2.6.
svarūpa (स्वरूप)stemone's own form.
upalabdhi (उपलब्धि)stemrecognition, getting sight of.
hetuḥ (हेतुः)nominative singular, masculinethe cause.
saṃyogaḥ (संयोगः)nominative singular, masculinethe joining. From 2.17.

The phrases

The joining is not only the cause of suffering. It is the cause of recognizing the two powers, owner and owned, each in its own form. svarūpa (स्वरूप) + upalabdhi (उपलब्धि) is a (अ) + u (उ) = o (ओ), recited svarūpopalabdhi (स्वरूपोपलब्धि).

hetuḥ (हेतुः) and saṃyogaḥ (संयोगः) are two nominatives: the joining is that cause. Without the joining, the two powers would not be told apart by a mind that has to see them.

Sanskrit in this line

Dual -oḥ (ओः) again, “of the two powers.” a (अ) + u (उ) = o (ओ) in svarūpopalabdhi (स्वरूपोपलब्धि), the sandhi of 2.4. Read sva-svāmi (स्वस्वामि) as owned and owner, not as “oneself and a husband.” svāmin (स्वामिन्) here is the one who owns.

Say it back

Say what the joining is the cause of. The dual ending tells you it is two powers, not one.

Next

2.24. Its cause is ignorance.