2.2.9

Brahma Sūtra / Adhyāya 2 / 2.2.9

विप्रतिषेधाच् चासमञ्जसम्

vipratiṣedhāc cāsamañjasam

The line

Because of a conflict between two rules, a compound: cāsa (चास), mañja (मञ्ज), and an equalizing, a rejoinder that turns an example back.

Where it sits

In Brahma Sūtra (सूत्र), adhyāya (अध्याय) 2. Avirodha. The teaching does not collide with reasoning, or with the other systems, in the way an objector claims. The line is short. abhyupagame (अभ्युपगमे) from 2.2.8 is still in force. A sūtra (सूत्र) leaves a word out when the line before still holds it. That carrying is anuvṛtti (अनुवृत्ति).

Split: vipratiṣedhāt (विप्रतिषेधात्) + cāsa-mañja-sama (चास-मञ्ज-सम)

Sanskrit, in depth

The words

WordGrammarSense
vipratiṣedhāt (विप्रतिषेधात्)ablative singulara conflict between two rules
cāsa-mañja-sama (चास-मञ्ज-सम)a compound, the ending is on the last membera compound: cāsa (चास), mañja (मञ्ज), and an equalizing, a rejoinder that turns an example back. Read it from the end

The phrases

vipratiṣedhāt (विप्रतिषेधात्) is a conflict between two rules. It stands as ablative singular. The line writes it vipratiṣedhāc (विप्रतिषेधाच्).

cāsa-mañja-sama (चास-मञ्ज-सम) is a compound: cāsa (चास), mañja (मञ्ज), and an equalizing, a rejoinder that turns an example back. Read it from the end. It stands as a compound, the ending is on the last member.

Sanskrit in this line

cāsa-mañja-sama (चास-मञ्ज-सम) is one compound. The hyphen is a teaching mark. Only the last member wears the case. The line writes it vipratiṣedhāc (विप्रतिषेधाच्).

Say it back

Cover the English. Gloss vipratiṣedhāt (विप्रतिषेधात्) and cāsa-mañja-sama (चास-मञ्ज-सम).

Next

2.2.10. mahaddīrghavad (महद्दीर्घवद्) or, by means of hrasvaparimaṇḍala (ह्रस्वपरिमण्डल).