Aṣṭāvakra Gītā / Aṣṭāvakra (अध्याय १८) / 18.7

18.7

the Aṣṭāvakra Gītā (अष्टावक्र गीता)

समस्तं कल्पनामात्रमात्मा मुक्तः सनातनः ।
इति विज्ञाय धीरो हि किमभ्यस्यति बालवत्
samastaṃ kalpanāmātram ātmā muktaḥ sanātanaḥ |
iti vijñāya dhīro hi kim abhyasyati bālavat

The line

The whole is mere imagining, and the self is free and eternal. Having understood this, what does the steady one practice, like a child?

नेपालीमा

सबै कल्पनामात्र हो, आत्मा मुक्त र सनातन हो। यसो बुझेर धीरले बालकजस्तै के अभ्यास गर्छ?

Where it sits

Astavakra is still speaking. A question follows the two claims closed by iti.

Split: samastam (समस्तम्) + kalpanāmātram (कल्पनामात्रम्) + ātmā (आत्मा) + muktaḥ (मुक्तः) + sanātanaḥ (सनातनः) + iti (इति) + vijñāya (विज्ञाय) + dhīraḥ (धीरः) + hi (हि) + kim (किम्) + abhyasyati (अभ्यस्यति) + bālavat (बालवत्)

Sanskrit, in depth

The words

WordGrammarSense
samastam (समस्तम्)nominative singular, neuterthe whole.
kalpanāmātram (कल्पनामात्रम्)nominative singular, neutermere imagining. Agrees with samastam (समस्तम्).
ātmā (आत्मा)nominative singular, masculinethe self.
muktaḥ (मुक्तः)nominative singular, masculinefree. Agrees with ātmā (आत्मा).
sanātanaḥ (सनातनः)nominative singular, masculineeternal. Agrees with ātmā (आत्मा).
iti (इति)indeclinablethus. It closes both claims.
vijñāya (विज्ञाय)indeclinablehaving understood.
dhīraḥ (धीरः)nominative singular, masculinethe steady one. Recited dhīro (धीरो) before h (ह्).
hi (हि)indeclinableindeed.
kim (किम्)accusative singular, neuterwhat.
abhyasyati (अभ्यस्यति)present third person singularpractices.
bālavat (बालवत्)indeclinablelike a child.

The phrases

iti closes two identifications: samastam is kalpanāmātram (कल्पनामात्रम्), and ātmā (आत्मा) is muktaḥ (मुक्तः) sanātanaḥ (सनातनः). vijñāya (विज्ञाय) belongs to dhīraḥ (धीरः), the subject of kim abhyasyati. bālavat (बालवत्) marks the manner.

Sanskrit in this line

kalpanāmātram (कल्पनामात्रम्) ātmā (आत्मा) keeps m before ā (आ), kalpanāmātramātmā (कल्पनामात्रमात्मा). dhīraḥ (धीरः) before hi is dhīro (धीरो). kim abhyasyati keeps m before a.

Say it back

What two claims does he understand before the question?