1.2.22

Mīmāṃsā Sūtra / Adhyāya 1 / 1.2.22

उक्तं तु वाक्यशेषत्वम्

uktaṃ tu vākyaśeṣatvam

The line

But it has been stated that it is the remainder of the sentence.

नेपालीमा

तर त्यो वाक्यको बाँकी हो भनी भनिसकिएको छ।

Where it sits

Vākyaśeṣa (वाक्यशेष) names the ekavākya (एकवाक्य) relation of 1.2.7. Tu answers the alternative that began at 1.2.19. The post sentence is still the subject.

Split: uktam (उक्तम्) + tu (तु) + vākya-śeṣatvam (वाक्य-शेषत्वम्)

Sanskrit, in depth

The words

WordGrammarSense
uktam (उक्तम्)nominative singular, neuterit has been stated
tu (तु)indeclinablebut
vākya-śeṣatvam (वाक्य-शेषत्वम्)nominative singular, neuterthe state of being the remainder of the sentence

The phrases

It has been stated that these words form one sentence with the injunction. The fruit-words here belong to the udumbara post. There is no udumbara post enjoined apart from this sentence, so a fruit-command standing alone would have nothing to attach to.

There is no separate word that says 'praise.' From the fruit-words one understands that the thing has a fruit, and what has a fruit is commended. That second understanding is the praise. 'Vigor' is figurative. As food is a means of satisfaction, this wood is spoken of with a word for that kind of power, because it can be connected with ripe fruit. The sentence commends the post. It does not open a second rite called 'securing vigor.'

Sanskrit in this line

Śeṣa (शेष) is the remainder, the part that belongs with the main statement. Vākyaśeṣatva (वाक्यशेषत्व) is that role, as an abstract. Uktam points back to 1.2.7.

Say it back

Return to the one-sentence view, and say what is decided about the fig-wood post: the vigor-words praise it.

Next

1.2.23. Where a command is impossible, the sentence is praise, and the others follow.