11.4.4

Mīmāṃsā Sūtra / Adhyāya 11 / 11.4.4

अनियमः स्यादिति चेत्

aniyamaḥ syād iti cet

The line

If you say that the absence of a fixed rule, it would be. syāt (स्यात्) before a voiced sound, then.

Where it sits

In Mīmāṃsā (मीमांसा) Sūtra (सूत्र), adhyāya (अध्याय) 11. One performance serving many purposes, and when the acts stay separate. The line is short. cānyārthadarśanam (चान्यार्थदर्शनम्) from 11.4.3 is still in force. A sūtra (सूत्र) leaves a word out when the line before still holds it. That carrying is anuvṛtti (अनुवृत्ति).

Split: aniyamaḥ (अनियमः) + syād (स्याद्) + iti (इति) + cet (चेत्)

Sanskrit, in depth

The words

WordGrammarSense
aniyamaḥ (अनियमः)nominative singular, masculinethe absence of a fixed rule
syād (स्याद्)optative, third person singularit would be. syāt (स्यात्) before a voiced sound
iti (इति)indeclinablethus. It closes a quote or a thought
cet (चेत्)indeclinableif you say, if

The phrases

aniyamaḥ (अनियमः) is the absence of a fixed rule. It stands as nominative singular, masculine. syād (स्याद्) is it would be. syāt (स्यात्) before a voiced sound. It stands as optative, third person singular.

iti (इति) is thus. It closes a quote or a thought. It stands as indeclinable. cet (चेत्) is if you say, if. It stands as indeclinable.

Sanskrit in this line

aniyamaḥ (अनियमः) is nominative singular, masculine. That ending is the work an English preposition would do.

Say it back

Cover the English. Gloss aniyamaḥ (अनियमः) and syād (स्याद्).

Next

11.4.5. Not because of upadiṣṭatva (उपदिष्टत्व).