12.1.36

Mīmāṃsā Sūtra / Adhyāya 12 / 12.1.36

न प्राङ्नियमात् तदर्थं हि

na prāṅniyamāt tadarthaṃ hi

The line

Not because of prāṅniyama (प्राङ्नियम), that, the thing, for the sake of.

Where it sits

In Mīmāṃsā (मीमांसा) Sūtra (सूत्र), adhyāya (अध्याय) 12. Prasaṅga (प्रसङ्ग), incidental application, and vikalpa (विकल्प), option. The line is short. brahmāpīti (ब्रह्मापीति) from 12.1.35 is still in force. A sūtra (सूत्र) leaves a word out when the line before still holds it. That carrying is anuvṛtti (अनुवृत्ति).

Split: na (न) + prāṅniyamāt (प्राङ्नियमात्) + tad (तद्) + arthaṃ (अर्थं) + hi (हि)

Sanskrit, in depth

The words

WordGrammarSense
na (न)indeclinablenot
prāṅniyamāt (प्राङ्नियमात्)ablative singularprāṅniyama (प्राङ्नियम)
tad (तद्)nominative or accusative singular, neuterthat
arthaṃ (अर्थं)accusative singularthe thing, for the sake of
hi (हि)indeclinablefor, indeed

The phrases

na (न) is not. It stands as indeclinable. prāṅniyamāt (प्राङ्नियमात्) is prāṅniyama (प्राङ्नियम). It stands as ablative singular. tad (तद्) is that. It stands as nominative or accusative singular, neuter.

arthaṃ (अर्थं) is the thing, for the sake of. It stands as accusative singular. The line joins them as tadarthaṃ (तदर्थं). hi (हि) is for, indeed. It stands as indeclinable.

Sanskrit in this line

prāṅniyamāt (प्राङ्नियमात्) is ablative singular. That ending is the work an English preposition would do. The line joins them as tadarthaṃ (तदर्थं).

Say it back

Cover the English. Gloss prāṅniyamāt (प्राङ्नियमात्) and arthaṃ (अर्थं).

Next

12.1.37. If you say that of stated, then.