6.4.11

Mīmāṃsā Sūtra / Adhyāya 6 / 6.4.11

न त्वशेषे वैगुण्यात् तदर्थं हि

na tv aśeṣe vaiguṇyāt tadarthaṃ hi

The line

Not the state of being that, in aśeṣa (अशेष), because of vaiguṇya (वैगुण्य), that, the thing, for the sake of.

Where it sits

In Mīmāṃsā (मीमांसा) Sūtra (सूत्र), adhyāya (अध्याय) 6. Who may perform. Eligibility, and the way substances are tied to an act. The words of this line are the ones to keep. A shorter line after this one may leave them unsaid.

Split: na (न) + tva (त्व) + aśeṣe (अशेषे) + vaiguṇyāt (वैगुण्यात्) + tad (तद्) + arthaṃ (अर्थं) + hi (हि)

Sanskrit, in depth

The words

WordGrammarSense
na (न)indeclinablenot
tva (त्व)the stem, as the line writes itthe state of being that
aśeṣe (अशेषे)locative singular, or nominative or accusative dual, neuteraśeṣa (अशेष)
vaiguṇyāt (वैगुण्यात्)ablative singularvaiguṇya (वैगुण्य)
tad (तद्)nominative or accusative singular, neuterthat
arthaṃ (अर्थं)accusative singularthe thing, for the sake of
hi (हि)indeclinablefor, indeed

The phrases

na (न) is not. It stands as indeclinable. tva (त्व) is the state of being that. It stands as the stem, as the line writes it. aśeṣe (अशेषे) is aśeṣa (अशेष). It stands as locative singular, or nominative or accusative dual, neuter. vaiguṇyāt (वैगुण्यात्) is vaiguṇya (वैगुण्य). It stands as ablative singular.

tad (तद्) is that. It stands as nominative or accusative singular, neuter. arthaṃ (अर्थं) is the thing, for the sake of. It stands as accusative singular. The line joins them as tadarthaṃ (तदर्थं). hi (हि) is for, indeed. It stands as indeclinable.

Sanskrit in this line

vaiguṇyāt (वैगुण्यात्) is ablative singular. That ending is the work an English preposition would do. The line joins them as tadarthaṃ (तदर्थं).

Say it back

Cover the English. Gloss tva (त्व) and aśeṣe (अशेषे).

Next

6.4.12. It would be. syāt (स्यात्) before a voiced sound or, because of a compound: what already follows, the efficient ground, and the state of being.