6.7.3

Mīmāṃsā Sūtra / Adhyāya 6 / 6.7.3

न भूमिः स्यात् सर्वान् प्रत्यविशिष्टत्वात्

na bhūmiḥ syāt sarvān pratyaviśiṣṭatvāt

The line

Not bhūma (भूम), it would be, let it be granted, all, because of a compound: toward, against, not set apart, and the state of being that.

Where it sits

In Mīmāṃsā (मीमांसा) Sūtra (सूत्र), adhyāya (अध्याय) 6. Who may perform. Eligibility, and the way substances are tied to an act. The words of this line are the ones to keep. A shorter line after this one may leave them unsaid.

Split: na (न) + bhūmiḥ (भूमिः) + syāt (स्यात्) + sarvān (सर्वान्) + prati-aviśiṣṭa-tvāt (प्रति-अविशिष्ट-त्वात्)

Sanskrit, in depth

The words

WordGrammarSense
na (न)indeclinablenot
bhūmiḥ (भूमिः)nominative singularbhūma (भूम)
syāt (स्यात्)optative, third person singularit would be, let it be granted
sarvān (सर्वान्)accusative plural, masculineall
prati-aviśiṣṭa-tvāt (प्रति-अविशिष्ट-त्वात्)ablative singulara compound: toward, against, not set apart, and the state of being that. Read it from the end

The phrases

na (न) is not. It stands as indeclinable. bhūmiḥ (भूमिः) is bhūma (भूम). It stands as nominative singular. syāt (स्यात्) is it would be, let it be granted. It stands as optative, third person singular.

sarvān (सर्वान्) is all. It stands as accusative plural, masculine. prati-aviśiṣṭa-tvāt (प्रति-अविशिष्ट-त्वात्) is a compound: toward, against, not set apart, and the state of being that. Read it from the end. It stands as ablative singular.

Sanskrit in this line

prati-aviśiṣṭa-tvāt (प्रति-अविशिष्ट-त्वात्) is one compound. The hyphen is a teaching mark. Only the last member wears the case.

Say it back

Cover the English. Gloss bhūmiḥ (भूमिः) and syāt (स्यात्).

Next

6.7.4. Because of akāryatva (अकार्यत्व) and, from that, then, again, a difference, it would be, let it be granted.