10.1.46

Mīmāṃsā Sūtra / Adhyāya 10 / 10.1.46

एकस्मिन् वा विप्रतिषेधात्

ekasmin vā vipratiṣedhāt

The line

ekasmin (एकस्मिन्) or, because of a conflict between two rules.

Where it sits

In Mīmāṃsā (मीमांसा) Sūtra (सूत्र), adhyāya (अध्याय) 10. Bādha (बाध): when a transferred detail is excluded. The line is short. sa (स) from 10.1.45 is still in force. A sūtra (सूत्र) leaves a word out when the line before still holds it. That carrying is anuvṛtti (अनुवृत्ति).

Split: ekasmin (एकस्मिन्) + vā (वा) + vipratiṣedhāt (विप्रतिषेधात्)

Sanskrit, in depth

The words

WordGrammarSense
ekasmin (एकस्मिन्)the form as the line writes itthis word, as the line writes it
vā (वा)indeclinableor
vipratiṣedhāt (विप्रतिषेधात्)ablative singulara conflict between two rules

The phrases

ekasmin (एकस्मिन्) is this word, as the line writes it. It stands as the form as the line writes it. vā (वा) is or. It stands as indeclinable.

vipratiṣedhāt (विप्रतिषेधात्) is a conflict between two rules. It stands as ablative singular.

Sanskrit in this line

vipratiṣedhāt (विप्रतिषेधात्) is ablative singular. That ending is the work an English preposition would do.

Say it back

Cover the English. Gloss ekasmin (एकस्मिन्) and vipratiṣedhāt (विप्रतिषेधात्).

Next

10.1.47. Not because of a compound: or, a different thing, and conjunction, in apūpa (अपूप), pākasaṃyukta (पाकसंयुक्त), a compound: holding, and a thing, a.